For professionals needing high-resolution VR with computer-tethered performance, HP Reverb G2 wins with its superior pixel density and expanded VR software access. However, for those seeking a lightweight, ergonomically sound headset with built-in controllers, notable visual quality and seamless comfort, the competitively priced Pico 4 is a worthy contender.

Detailed comparison: HP Reverb G2 vs Pico 4

Key Differences Between HP Reverb G2 and Pico 4

  • Resolution: HP Reverb G2 showcases 2,160 by 2,160 pixels per eye with LCDs, surpassing Pico 4’s over 2K resolution per eye.
  • Comfort & Design: Pico 4’s balanced, ergonomic design reduces frontal weight by 26.2% making it more comfortable for extended use than HP Reverb G2.
  • Controllers: HP Reverb G2’s improved motion controllers lack finger-tracking capabilities. Pico 4’s haptic motion controllers yield realistic tactile feedback.
  • External Compatibility: HP Reverb G2 connects to DisplayPort and USB-C, requiring Windows 10. Pico 4 operates on PICO OS 5.0 and does not specify additional compatibility requirements.
  • Tracking: HP Reverb G2 uses an improved four-camera setup for motion tracking. In contrast, Pico 4 uses a SLAM omnidirectional positioning system.
  • Field of View: Pico 4 has a 105° FOV, while HP Reverb G2’s FOV isn’t mentioned but could be smaller due to usual high-resolution VR Headsets.
  • Pricing: Pico 4 is less expensive at €429, compared to HP Reverb G2’s $599 price point.
Comparison HP Reverb G2 Pico 4 VR
Price $599 €429
Design Four camera setup, comfort improvements, no external sensors required. Small, ergonomic, evenly distributes weight for comfort.
Resolution 2,160×2,160px per eye Over 2K resolution per eye
Refresh Rate 90Hz Undefined
Compatibility SteamVR, Windows Mixed Reality PICO OS 5.0
Processor Requirement Intel Core i5, AMD Ryzen 5 or equivalent Snapdragon XR2
RAM Requirement Undefined 8GB LPDDR4 RAM (Enterprise Version – LPDDR5)
Positioning System Camera-based SLAM omnidirectional
Comfort Memory foam facemask. Glasses-friendly padding system. Reduced frontal weight and thickness. Automatic interpupillary distance adjustment.
Controllers Two motion controllers, no finger-tracking. Haptic motion controllers with realistic feedback.
Sound System Two speaker drivers on headband sides. 360° Stereo speakers with 3D spatial sound.
VR Platforms Windows Mixed Reality, SteamVR. PICO OS 5.0
Design Comfort Camera module can impact due to size. Weight evenly distributed for improved comfort.
Tracking Accuracy Camera-based, occasional hiccups. SLAM omnidirectional system.
Field of View Undefined 105°
Usage Professional and consumer usage. Undefined

>

What Is HP Reverb G2 and Who’s It For?

HP Reverb G2 is a revamped high-resolution VR headset intended for both consumers and professionals. Sporting a four-camera setup, immersive audio, and a comfortable facemask, it is an appealing choice for those seeking a PC-based VR experience. HP Reverb G2 competes directly against Oculus Quest 2, HTC Vive Pro 2, and Valve Index. Primarily, it appeals to those using Windows-based systems and SteamVR platform.

Colorful image of a user immersed in an augmented reality experience with the HP Reverb G2 in an office setting

Pros of HP Reverb G2

  • Sharp imagery with 2,160 by 2,160 pixels per eye at 90Hz resolution
  • Camera-based motion tracking
  • Compatible with both SteamVR and Windows Mixed Reality platforms

Cons of HP Reverb G2

  • Occasional tracking hiccups
  • Lacks support for wireless charging
  • Lower tracking accuracy due to lack of external sensors

What Is Pico 4 VR and Who’s It For?

Pico 4 VR is a compact VR headset designed by ByteDance, highlighting balanced design and immersive VR experience. It fashions ergonomics, high-resolution display, and advanced tracking capabilities targeting both consumers and businesses. The Pico 4’s unique selling proposition includes its lightweight design, high-resolution displays, and the Qualcomm Snapdragon XR2 platform that powers it. Primarily, it’s intended for VR enthusiasts seeking comfort and immersive experience.

Colorful image of person using Pico 4 VR headset in a living room setting

Pros of Pico 4 VR

  • Ergonomic and lightweight design
  • High-resolution display with over 2K resolution per eye
  • Uses Qualcomm Snapdragon XR2 platform

Cons of Pico 4 VR

  • Smaller field of view due to Pancake lenses
  • Limited game library
  • Dependence on built-in hand tracking function

Determining Your VR Victor: HP Reverb G2 vs Pico 4

In the competitive landscape of VR hardware, the pivotal question lingers; HP Reverb G2 or Pico 4?

For Professional Usage

HP Reverb G2 outshines with its superior resolution, extensive software compatibility, and room-sized VR capabilities. A worthy tool for immersive design, simulation, or training. However, the ongoing improvements to Microsoft Windows Mixed Reality can be a possible drawback.

Professional user exploring a VR scenario designed on HP Reverb G2

For Gaming Enthusiasts

Pico 4 offers a comfortable experience with decent resolution and tracking. Yet, it’s held back by the caveats of a limited game library, which certainly provokes thought for the gamers.

Gamer engaging in an immersive game using Pico 4 headset

For Budget-Conscious Consumers

The price-conscious should veer towards the HP Reverb G2, solely due to their trade-in discount offer, reducing the burning hole in your pocket considerably.

A frugal consumer comparing the price tags of HP Reverb G2 and Pico 4

For Comfort Seekers

The Pico 4 is king when it comes to ergonomics and weight distribution, ensuring prolonged comfortable usage. If comfort reigns supreme in your books, explore the Pico 4 universe.

User comfortably wearing Pico 4 headset for an extended duration

The corporate titan, HP Reverb G2, is top-drawer owing to its high-resolution prowess and expansive VR platform. Conversely, the agile Pico 4 reinvents comfort in VR experience but loses to an inferior game repertoire. Align your choice with your cardinal needs.

Patrick Daugherty

Content writer @ Aircada. Merging AR expertise with a love for late-night gaming sessions.