For advanced visuals, high-resolution streaming, and innovative mapping on unique shapes, MadMapper takes the crown. However, if you’re into sound, video, and light show controls with a central platform for design flexibility, QLab is your best bet.

Differences of MadMapper and QLab

Key Differences Between MadMapper and QLab

  • MadMapper is ideal for complex visual effects and innovative mapping on irregular shapes, while QLab excels in flexible design and control of sound, video, and light cues.
  • MadMapper supports high-resolution videos up to 16K and integrates with real-time graphic applications, while QLab offers up to 1,000 video layers with customizable geometry and projection mapping.
  • QLab provides workspace collaboration via remote connection and a comprehensive free feature list. MadMapper, however, comes at a starting cost of $399, with a discount for students or Modul8 license owners.
  • Both support DMX universes, but MadMapper further offers LED arrays and DMX fixtures control in real-time.
Comparison MadMapper QLab
Typical Use Projection mapping in theaters, theme parks, festivals Sound, video, light, show control cues for live events
Key Features High-resolution video, multi-projector compatibility, real-time control, 3D calibration, LED array control, integrated cue system, DMX output Audio cue creation, video projections, lighting controls, workspace collaboration, show control protocols, MIDI integration
Software Complexity May be complex for beginners Relatively easy to use due to cue-based design
License Pricing Commercial license starts at $399 Varies based on the chosen license
System Compatibility Windows 10, MacOSX 10.13+ macOS only
Required Resources 300 MB disk space, 2GB or more RAM, OpenGL3.3 compatible GPU System specifications based on individual project requirements
Video Formats Supported MP4 H264 H265-HEVC Mpeg PhotoJpeg, ProRes DNXd, HAP Qlab 5 now utilizes Apple’s new Metal framework for improved video processing
Updates and Support Regular updates by a development team Continuously developed and updated by Figure 53 since 2007

What Is MadMapper and Who’s It For?

MadMapper, developed by GarageCube, is a powerful application that aids users in real-time control for projection mapping on irregular and unique shapes. Garnering support from multi-projector setups at resolution quality up to 16K, the software bleeds potential for creating commanding visual effects. Intertwining theater performances, festivals, theme parks, and more, it finds application in a variety of locations. However, beginners might find its complexity daunting. Ideal for individuals who appreciate granular control over their designs, and look to build generative imagery through GLSL coding.

Colorful illumination on a uniquely shaped object at a festival, radiating the power of MadMapper's projection mapping

Pros of MadMapper

  • Supports high-resolution video up to 16K
  • Real-time control in the production process
  • Compatibility with multiple projectors

Cons of MadMapper

  • Complexity may challenge beginners
  • License pricing starts at $399

What Is QLab and Who’s It For?

QLab, developed by Figure 53, is known for its mastery over synchronizing and bringing harmony to sound, video, light, and show control cues. It’s a central platform for design flexibility and is the go-to for sound designers worldwide for creating and playback of live events audio. It’s ideal for professionals seeking command over multi-video layers and want to explore the capacities of Apple’s new Metal framework with the new video engine in QLab 5.

Colorful lights on a stage in a theatre, demonstrating the impact of sound, video, and light control in QLab

Pros of QLab

  • Trusted by sound designers globally
  • Supports creating and playback of audio cues for live events
  • New video engine in QLab 5 utilizing Apple’s new Metal framework

Cons of QLab

  • Cues triggered by a GO button or space bar press, limiting direct control

MadMapper and QLab: The Final Verdict

In the technicolor world of visualization and control cues, two giants stand tall: MadMapper and QLab. But which is the superior choice for your needs? Let’s dive headfirst into the dataverse.

Projection Mapping Enthusiasts

If you’re deep into projection mapping, MadMapper will be your guide. From concerts to theme parks, it offers impressive real-time control, ace support for high-res videos up to 16K, and compatibility with multiple projectors. You soak in the joy of shaping the irregular and building mesmerizing visuals, even as you control LED arrays and DMX fixtures in real-time. The community sharing of generative images is a cherry on the top.

Artist adept at projection mapping, engaged in creating a visual spectacle for a concert using MadMapper

Show Control Cues Designers

QLab, the industry standard solution for show control cues, is sure to sweep you off your feet. Whether it’s playback for audio cues, making projections, or flexible lighting control – QLab is your trusty sidekick. The bi-directional MIDI integration, support for different protocols, coupled with a collaborative workspace for cross-cue customizations, is a dream for show control gurus. Plus, it has a free features galore.

Sound designer, hands on the QLab console, perfecting the audio cues for a live show

Projection Mapping Newbies

If you’re just getting your feet wet in the projection mapping world, MadMapper’s MiniMad could be your starting point. Even though it lacks some of MadMapper’s high-end features like bezier curves and unlimited Syphon sources, its standalone nature and web browser-based control panel make workspace navigation smoother for beginners.

A beginner in projection mapping, exploring the MiniMad interface on his computer

Between Madmapper and QLab, your choice swings on your preference between superior projection mapping or robust show control cues. For projection mapping diehards, MadMapper provides unmatched control and visual power. For the maestros of live events and theatres, QLab delivers unmatched audio, video, and lighting cue solutions.

Tiffany Brise

Content writer @ Aircada, patiently awaiting a consumer AR headset that doesn’t suck.