If you’re a business/creator stepping into AR, Worldcast is the optimal choice; it offers a more immersive, interactive, and cost-effective platform. Yet, for developers and pros seeking a platform with direct AR visualization and user interaction across multiple elements, Onirix is more advantageous.
Key Differences Between Worldcast and Onirix
Coding: Worldcast requires no coding, Onirix is suitable for both developers and non-technical users.
Price: Worldcast charges $10/cast/month for business whereas Onirix charges from €89 per month with a free version and trial available.
Features: Worldcast excels in creatives with Sketchfab integration, GeoCAST and Canva integration; Onirix provides user interaction and transition between multiple elements.
Support: Worldcast supports export of .PNG, .JPG, .MP3, .MP4, .GLTF/GLB files; Onirix integrates with Unity via SDK for iOS device permission management.
Comparison
WorldCAST
Onirix Studio
AR Web Platform
Yes
Yes
No Coding Required
Yes
Yes
Supports 3D Models, animations, and 2D image capability
Yes
Yes
Sectors Applicable
Education, Non-profits, Tourism, Retail, Real Estate
Nonprofits, Graphic Design, IT services, Software Firms, Program Development
Includes Unity Integration via SDK for iOS device permission management
What Is WorldCAST AR and Who’s It For?
WorldCAST AR is an immersive, zero-coding AR creation platform developed with an agency-centric approach. It offers a marker-based, markerless, and geospatial content placement with an easy-to-use spatial editor. Ideal for creators, artists, businesses and sectors like education, non-profit, tourism, retail, and real estate.
The platform integrates Sketchfab and Canva lending 3D model availability and access to over 1 million templates. With its web accessible, geo-coordinated content placement, WorldCAST AR crafts AR experiences for everything from historical tours to retail branding. A cost-effective, data-informed, browser-based platform for the AR needs of the modern world.
Pros of WorldCAST AR
Allows immersive/interactive experience creation
No coding required
Supports a broad spectrum of application across sectors
Integrated solutions with Sketchfab and Canva
Cost-effective, with no contract required
Data analytics for audience engagement
Accessible on most smart devices and desktops
Cons of WorldCAST AR
Does not currently support FBX/OBJ/DAE files
Requires browser access, no standalone application
What Is Onirix Studio and Who’s It For?
Onirix Studio, based in Spain, is proficient in providing AR content creation and publishing services. It crafts user interactions and transitions with videos, 3D models, audio files. The platform is treasured by diverse sectors from IT services to program development and graphic design.
Its WebAR player supports effortless content sharing across digital platforms. Onirix Studio’s target audience includes developers and professionals, fostering AR service UX enhancements. It holds its grounds against competitors like Vidinoti, Pikkart AR SDK, Expoodle, ARGear, and more.
Pros of Onirix Studio
Powerful yet simple AR content creation
Suits diverse industry needs
Direct AR visualization in web browser
Reasonable pricing model with a free version
Support for integrations like Unity via SDK
Cons of Onirix Studio
Pricing could be steep for smaller companies
No ‘pay as you go’ license model
Worldcast vs Onirix: Pricing
Worldcast operates on a model of $10/cast/month for business use, while Onirix’s pricing starts from €89 per month, with a free version and trial available.
Worldcast
Worldcast offers a simplistic pricing structure, without any barrier to entry. The platform allows for unhindered creativity as there is zero registration fee and no binding contract. It charges $10 per cast each month, specifically for business utilization of its services. This affordable rate allows businesses in various sectors to leverage immersive and interactive AR experiences.
Onirix
Onirix provides a more differentiated pricing strategy, starting as low as €89 per month. Recognizing different user needs, it also offers a free version as well as a trial variant. Despite some reviews suggesting that pricing could be high for smaller operations, the platform seems to balance this with its easy-to-use interface and distinctive features. However, a ‘pay as you go’ model for paused projects is absent, which may affect project cost flexibility.
So, WorldCAST or Onirix? Here’s Our Verdict:
After a careful perusal of both platforms, we have discerned the ideal audiences for each solution.
FOR DEVELOPERS AND SMALL BUSINESSES
Given its simplicity, no coding requirement, and pricing model, Worldcast could be the go-to choice for developers, small businesses, and novices in AR/VR content creation. Its practicality in retail, real estate, and education sectors make it a viable tool.
FOR AGENCIES AND LARGE ORGANIZATIONS
Onirix could be a potent ally for larger corporations and agencies. Despite being more expensive, its capacious AR capabilities with multiple interactive elements and its purported ease of use make it worth the investment.
FOR THE TOURISM INDUSTRY
The Worldcast GeoCAST features shows promising application in the tourism sector for creating outdoor events and interactive tours. However, Onirix also excels in this area, adding value for visits to tourist sites.
FOR THE RETAIL INDUSTRY
When it comes to retail, both Onirix and Worldcast stand toe to toe with their interactive AR capabilities, with a slight edge to Worldcast for its appealing business pricing model.
Concisely, WorldCAST’s ease and affordability make it suitable for budding VR creators and SMEs while Onirix’s prowess caters to professionals and larger organizations. Both are enablers of AR-based creativity, each making a stand in distinct market corners.
Tiffany Brise
Content writer @ Aircada, patiently awaiting a consumer AR headset that doesn’t suck.
